November is coming to a close, and I haven't finished an entire book of poetry. I have one I have been reading, and it's lovely and wonderful and I enjoy it more than any other poetry I've ever read. It's an anthology entitled Good Poems and it's edited by Garrison Keillor (who doesn't love GK?). But it's long, and I'm only a third of the way through it.
So, the other day I thought: geez, I'll never finish in time. So, I got a slim little Lucille Clifton volume out and started reading that instead, which is wonderful too but isn't what I really want to be reading. I was just doing it because it's feasible and I could finish in a few days.
And then I thought: really, Amy? Really? You're competing with yourself and stressing out over reading a book of poetry, something that you should be enjoying and loving and doing in those few moments you have to settle down, sit with a cup of tea and relax?
So, the book of poetry will take some time. And I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that those of you who read this blog (are there four now?) aren't going to gasp in horror that it didn't get done "in time."
MamaP
Not only will I not gasp in horror I will suggest that if you are truly reading poetry in a way where you can let it sink in and be affected by it... you can't really read a book of poetry quickly. So it means you are doing something right for it to take a while. I love that collection edited by Garrison Keillor and have checked it out from the library a handful of times. Also, the only books of poetry I have read close to straight through are Pablo Neruda and Billy Collins.
ReplyDelete